Аннотация:
-
-
-
- There could be several copies of the Voynich Manuscript, and they differed from each other. Perhaps several fragments from different versions of the manuscript survived, and then they were put together. Evidences: A. 5 fragments of the Voynich Manuscript were written by 5 different people (Lisa Fagin Davis (2022, 2023)). They differ syntactically and stylistically and very likely belong to five different versions of the Voynich Manuscript. B. 2 duplicates of circular diagrams "Aberil" and "May" (f70v1 vs f71r and f72r1 vs f71v) were made by 2 different people. They differ syntactically and stylistically and very likely belong to two different versions of the Voynich Manuscript. What is the point of duplicating diagrams within one version of the manuscript? If these were paired diagrams that complement each other, then these paired diagrams would be on the same page and would be executed in the same style. The sheet f71r/f71v belonged to another version of the Voynich Manuscript. These manuscripts were a tool for manipulating symbols and women. C. Education in the field of magic (in particular astrology and medical magic) was the prerogative of men. Therefore, they "helped" noble ladies conduct white magic sessions. The Voynich Manuscripts gave these sessions a special charm, "possessing" a kind of magical power. Other books were also used, such as "Chiromantie" by Johannes Hartlieb, brought as gifts to duchesses. ... Wanting to resist diseases, noble ladies became interested in medical magic, which they knew little about, since they were not allowed to receive the appropriate education. Therefore, magical sessions were ruled by learned men - court doctors, who, based on predictions of health risks, wrote out prescriptions for ladies for expensive medicines from various herbs or for medicinal baths based on herbal solutions. To make the predictions more convincing, the Voynich Manuscripts, of which there were at least five copies, were used at that sessions.
-
|