Аннотация: A look at human liberty as the desire of self-consciousness to change oneself in human existence in the conditions of a resisting environment.
Any person isn't imperious to be exempted from himself. It is possible, it seems, to draw a conclusion: If such exemption is absent, then is no liberty for him, that liberty generally - chimera.
Really, liberty, if to represent it as independence, is incompatible with any coercion and any restrictions, in particular, with the circumstances, age specifics, education level, features of education and character (shyness, politeness, deference, coldness, vigor, sociability, etc.), views and mentality, family relationships, traditions, pressure of the employer, laws, public institutes, and, at last,the limitation of lifetime - the person is mortal.
Such liberty - the typical phantom.
Nevertheless, vast majority of people, judging by their behavior, which is reflected in information sources, associate liberty with independence from one or the other, supposing to untangle all vital nodes and to provide the independence, in particular, thanks to of increase in the bank account, acquisition of additional property, breakthrough to power or, on the contrary, the removal into solitude.
But to untangle does not succeed anything, on the contrary, the aspiration to independence by the specified means results the person to difficulties in the management of property, preservation of capital, loss of power because of the instability of the material world, of the fragility of human relationships, complexity to control it all, while keeping opportunities for self-development, etc.
From this emerges despair, mental disorder, uncertainty in correctness of its place and the direction of own motion.
On the other hand, the removal from the world in solitude, apparent independence from the world in it - is illusory, inasmuch the person in the world should express self anyway, develop, fight, communicate, but not to become reserved or in a cave, the more that connection to the world he all the same fails to interrupt - he willy-nilly must feed somehow, he does not able to get rid of thoughts about events in the world, all the time returning to them, if not personally, then in memory, i.e. he can't be exempted completely from the world, and his aspiration to implement release from the world is no more than manifestation of egoism and fear to live, disguised by aspiration allegedly to supreme values unavailable in normal life.
Solitude in the form of the isolation from the world leads to loss of time of life, exit from values of human community in favor of fictitious values of some other, otherworldly world, and to a stop in development of own consciousness, inasmuch only in vital collisions this development happens, but not in blissful chants which at best are meditation.
So independence is only the negotiable side of liberty, which faces toward the external - liberty "from", but not liberty "for".
Of course, the person can't do without this flip side of liberty, inasmuch he lives among things and other people, but it isn't necessary to associate it with liberty, denying such, owing to impossibility to get rid of vital fetters, i.e. it is impossible to forget about another - face side of liberty, which represents of liberty, namely: activity, which can't be exterminated in any living being in any way.
The active differs from the passive exactly by internal aspiration to changes of itself in the person in an external environment, by inability to settle down safely and permanently among things, the order which the active (consciousness) cannot be satisfied, because exactly it arranged this order, but without complete confidence in correctness of this order. Consciousness in the person finds right there the shortcomings, which lead to awareness by the active (consciousness) of its own omissions and, respectively, of own certain insolvency.
Therefore, as the source of liberty, manifested in all the actions of the person in his interaction with the outside world, things and people, can only be his consciousness in the form of self-consciousness, which is initially active, i.e. uncomforted and dissatisfied by itself and, therefore, by any order and any relations, which actually are absent without it generally, or which completely depend on him, inasmuch the person oneself produces the external circumstances (his consciousness) and he oneself is exempted from them.
This activity is expressed in the person in his enduring aspiration to build an ideal order and to arrange harmony between people. He, naturally, never reaches of this among unstable things and imperfect people, but in this aspiration it reaches the main thing - the development of own consciousness, and that is his true destination.
Essence of liberty is comprehended for the person only in the representation of the same person, who is not that other, as the combination of the lowest and highest forms of consciousness in the form of organic compounds of a body. Therefore, all actions of the person are expressed in the interweaving of the instinctive and the comprehended.
For any kind of consciousness in the living being liberty is the internal state caused by the imperishable own activity which is shown in permanent dissatisfaction with self. This dissatisfaction leads any living creature forward, being reflected in conscious and unconscious actions, in particular, for the person, to the overcome the incessant resistance of the environment, and a kind of "drive belt" for the instinctive actions of a person to resolve his unconscious dissatisfaction with the situation, or the impetus for action is the subconscious persistence, whereas a similar impetus, but already to the actions to overcome the conscious dissatisfaction in his self-consciousness is the will.
In the lowest consciousness liberty in action is manifested instinctively, i.e. without an explicit goal, by trials and errors.
Liberty in action is manifested by the highest consciousness as the volition - in the form of the aspiration to the scheduled purpose. This type of consciousness is already capable to qualify, i.e. to understand the restrictions of aspirations to the scheduled purposes as the captivity), and the release from these shackles as liberty "from", naming therefore this liberation as independence, which can be reached by the conscious effort in the form already the will in certain direction.
Besides, the person acquires ability to select from some set what more corresponds to his interests as at present, and also in the future. In other words, thanks to consciousness it finds ability to regulate and plan the life as he wants, but taking into account a surrounding, and evaluating consequences of scheduled acts in advance, i.e. understanding what will have to answer for them as the front of himself, and before own surrounding.
However, this essential adding in consciousness of the living being (self-consciousness), who allows it to comprehend self and, apparently, to behave reasonably and responsibly, in no way diminishes the action of the lowest (animal) consciousness, which at any moment can start blocking all sorts of aspirations of highest consciousness, if only will seem to it, that they are contrary to human survival, or even if they can impair the quality of his life.
Nevertheless, the person, who represents the lowest and the highest consciousness, merged together in the form of a body, is material manifestation of action of liberty as in instinctive and conscious aspirations. Internal contradictoriness of these aspirations and at the same time their unity in a common base doesn't allow to determine actions of the person as purely conscious or purely unconscious. Therefore, accurately to predict actions of any person or to predetermine them is impossible, and in this also is manifested liberty.
Thereby the free manifestations of the person, i.e. his advance forward happen by means of as instinctive and conscious actions.
The explicit impossibility for the person to escape from public and natural fetters led, as it seems at first sight, to the fruitful idea: liberty is the cognized necessity.
However, this restriction of liberty in favor of some order doesn't explain ways of this cognition - necessity in a type of order, organization is manifested everywhere, but everything can't be cognized - neither in one human life, nor in life of many generations, especially as everything continuously changes, and on the cognition is required time.
Besides, this purely external interpretation of liberty can cause bewilderment due to the fact that even if to admit of knowing or understanding of all restrictions, with which are encountered the person, it is possible to qualify such cognition only as humility before external thingness factors, which thereby are admitted as primary.
Similar approach, in effect, denies development and can result not to liberty, but to the thought of release from similar oppression only after death, or to the paranoid idea that the course of soulless things must determine (to dictate) all motions of the person.
Last automatically assumes the totalitarianism in the public relations, which is trying to deprive of the person and liberty, and independence that leads it as a result to crash. A notable illustration of this result is the drop during not so long time almost all Marxist regimes that have adopted this "remarkable" formula of liberty.
This kind of result again shows the inadequacy of the domination of things over consciousness, which arranges the world for self, starting since the formation of things on own understanding, that is, in accordance with the existing form-building abilities at it.
Whatever it was, but the person in the habitat is associated with it not only by the genetic memory, he gets the in the course of the maturation, development a whole range of household and religious precepts, cultural principles; willy-nilly, he is forced to follow the customs of the current social environment. On this basis and owing to an own experience of life the person works out certain habits, which he follows all the life.
Thus, all this complex of communications with the environment holds the person within a certain order, and he is forced to follow by this order.
However, necessity exists for consciousness only in order for to overcome it.
If animals participate in this process not being aware of themselves, without separating in own consciousness from the environment, but, nevertheless, anyway change the environment, and change with it, possessing thereby, as the living beings, by rudiments of liberty, but to the person, as to the living being, which understands oneself, is capable not only to follow a habit, to established communications, i.e. - to necessity. He lowers self by this adherence to the habits actually up to animal level. Of course, the habit in the basis is the repulsion of new, unclear and frightening. The habit calms the person. But, anyway, the repose relaxes the person. He begins to lag behind from changes, which appears indispensably in life, in the environment, whereas dissatisfaction, activity force the person not only to move from place to place, to change a profession, religion, but also to consciously improve way of life, to acquire additional knowledge, to invent, extracting from self not only emotions and rational actions, but also the feelings, thoughts contradicting the existing order.
This dissatisfaction of consciousness, aspirations for the new is fueled by the ongoing changing flows of information, penetrating the whole being of the person, which he can interpret, possessing self-consciousness, in different ways, to the best of his understanding. Thereby each person inevitably commits all the time of oscillations from a habit to destruction of an order, to the release from it. Having set one and having joined to it, it begins to be weighed upon it sooner or later, and decides to change it despite all the resistance of own external conservative nature.
As a result of the emergence of the new originate additional communications, is being expanded the cognitive environment, that means the continuous increment of information flows, to which has to be adjusted every person.
So occurs, the person wants this or not, the change of his own consciousness, that in fact, and is required for consciousness itself.
As for resting state, then in respect of absolute calm it is a pure chimera, and in life state of rest is only temporal rest, a respite for a body and consciousness in a dream or in switching to other types of activity.
This fact is explained by that the person in the basis is the information copy of the appropriate fragments of an unmanifested infinity, and this copy is updated discretely with super-high frequency.
In other words, the person represents in a holographic projection of an unmanifested infinity the "blinking" cluster of information on a wave basis, converted into the living being in the frames of beingness, i.e. in self-acting formation, forming own time, in which it is in the move and the change among things and similar to it formations on the base of own understanding, as well as on understanding of single consciousness in the frames of this or that order.
Chaos is excluded here because high-frequency up-date of a holographic projection automatically assumes causality of this irreversible information process, inasmuch copying of objects in the course of each update of a holographic projection is carried out sequentially on the basis of what is available, but with high frequency. Therefore, changes of copies of things in case of each pulse are insignificant and tied to previous forms. As a result, in each individual consciousness high-frequency update is reflected not the chaotic, but ordered processes of change of beingness, surrounding it, with respect for the principle of causality.
In similar Creation, as if every instant appearing and disappearing, it is senseless to speak about calm, especially that this Creation is being kept from falling into nothingness by the living beings, which form through themselves beingness in the form time, space, things in motion without stopping, or infinitely [1. Chapter 1].
If both sides of "coin" of liberty for the person are activity and independence, then, at least, the responsibility can't but be as an edge of this coin.
Each person tries to comprehend the actions, aiming to reach in them maximum efficiency in achievement of a goal. The people, surrounding him, can have opposite aspirations. The consensus isn't always achievable here. Therefore, efficiency of actions of one person can do much harm others and even to him in the future. There is no output from this situation and it is necessary to be responsible for deeds sooner or later.
Life isn't measured by successes and failures, inasmuch each human life is specific manifestation of consciousness, for which is important the process, but not local results. The person, as a rule, does not understand this, being indignant on an assemblage of misfortunes which are falling down on him, utter darkness of his short existence, coming to the end with diseases and death, regardless of, he is rich or it is poor, smart or silly, experienced or careless, visionary or obedient to destiny.
The person finds the consolation in necessity (fatum, fortune, destiny, God or yet something exterior, outside, but not in himself), justifying own limitation and insolvency by circumstances, which always are, and from which he depends.
In other words, the person tries thereby to avoid of the responsibility for the decisions, without wishing to take it over.
The person doesn't understand that he creates the circumstances oneself, in order that his consciousness tested through him itself in them. During these tests his own consciousness can express itself in interaction with surroundings and understand own weak and strong sides, answering one way or another for their actions.
Therefore, responsibility is a certain promise of consciousness to self to pass the alleged tests both with waiting of a certain reaction of surroundings, and with readiness to accept any consequences of what is undertaken. Possible consequences consist in fulfillment of the promise, in cancellation from execution of promise, in fiasco of the enterprise.
The responsibility is connected directly to experience, inasmuch the accumulation of life experience represents, in effect, the gradual mastering by ability to be taken into account of the reaction of surroundings concerning own acts in combination with adequate planning of own actions.
The responsibility is reflected for the consciousness in censure or in approval of itself both on character of promises, and by results of own acts, that there is that other as the manifestation of conscience, i.e. the true assessment of own acts.
In particular, for showing the weakness and conformism consciousness in the person has to answer rolling away to its former positions and starting all anew, rebuking itself.
As for the irresponsibility, it is deception of oneself, so how the irresponsibility consists in false promises, impunity for which is impossible - an order hinders by it.
Violation of an order as a result of the irresponsible acts turns out for the irresponsible personality as chaos, which it didn't expect and in which heit is being lost, without being able without appropriate preparation be applied for new circumstances and, the more so, to overcome them.
It follows that the responsibility for own actions comes sooner or later.
It means: there is no absolute liberty and independence neither in mind, nor in acts, and liberty for the person in life actually is an opportunity conscious manifestation of the activity in frames necessity (this or that dependence), for any extension which (these frame) have to take responsible.
However, here dominates activity (consciousness), which oneself initially puts to itself this framework (but not falls into them by accident), and, therefore, initially willing to take the responsibility.
Another matter, how adequately each human life proceeds, but it isn't necessary to lament here because the source of liberty is consciousness, which always is present in the person, determining indispensable presence of liberty in him.
Though, of course, the equality sign between the person and consciousness can't be set, so how the person is natural restriction of consciousness for development and expression of consciousness together with development of the person. Therefore, this restriction (the person) can't be eliminated, but attempts of an output from this restriction by consciousness proceed in beingness eternally, i.e. in time which each person separately and by all set of reasonable beings creates, without suspecting about this.
As a result, no matter how weak was the person and no matter how peculiar to him were attempts to evade from activity and by that - from responsibility, he inevitably fails in them that is determined by his own initial essence.
Thus, the result of life, concerning development of each individual consciousness, is determined by finding by the person of an optimum combination of own dissatisfaction in the form of desires, aspirations to these or those goals with the available set of opportunities and own characteristic features (the present frames of the reality, or order), which should be used, from which is necessary to be exempted or by which can be neglected, as well as by the attitude towards results of own activity, for which will have to bear the response. The deviation from an optimum means that the person had not found himself in life, or rather, didn't identify the true building of own consciousness in the relation to surroundings and didn't add to it new properties.
Be that as it may, search of himself is a real face of liberty of the person in beingness that distinguishes him from the other living beings, who do not comprehend of themselves in beingness and therefore deprived of an opportunity consciously to look for and find themselves in the world.
As for the existing definitions of liberty, they do not give an idea of its essence, precisely because their authors do not know both source of liberty, and its mission, and, therefore, to understand its essence they are not able.
In confirmation of this state of affairs can result in some of the definitions of liberty with their short characteristic from our side [2. Chapter 1].
Liberty - the idea reflecting such relation of the subject to own actions, when whom he is their determining reason, and they directly are not caused by natural, social, interpersonal-communicative and individual-patrimonial factors.
Here liberty at first is an idea, then liberty is the relation, and, finally, liberty is the reason. Whether not too there are a lot of heterogeneous concepts? Outwardly all it seems very reasonable in this definition, but it is reduced to the person, who is considered by the reason of liberty. It and is so clear. But that such is available in the person, in order to he became by the reason of liberty, does not reveal.
Liberty is the domination over circumstances competently.
Here liberty is the knowledge, thanks to which everything has to turn out. But if knowledge does not help, what, liberty will disappear? The knowledge, information is some conditions for manifestation of liberty, but conditions are not so sufficient. The knowledge can be both without the use and with the inadequate use.
Besides, there is no action in knowledge - in itself it is dead: information without use turns into a warehouse. The knowledge, in principle, cannot be the complete, and the person has the knowledge in large measure as misinformation, following which he comes to crash. Here more likely circumstances dominate over us, and the person - their victim. Not for nothing speak: "A lot of knowledge - many afflictions".
Liberty is an ability to make a choice on the basis of distinguishing of good and evil.
This definition of liberty too approves priority of knowledge for liberty, only no deeds, but certain moral categories that, in itself, is the whole problem. Still nobody knows of it. Something seems by evil for some people, it's the same - good for others. What is here liberty! Anybody has no such ability and cannot has at least because in our world all life is based on an antagonism, and for the person the purpose, the aspiration of his rival cannot be as good in any way and often promises to him death. The abstract good or the evil does not exist.
Liberty is possibility of the manifestation by the subject of will on the basis of understanding of laws of development of the nature and society.
In this definition to the knowledge about which was told above, the will as a certain effort for the aid to the knowledge is added. To realize even, it seems, the correct laws though in many cases, the laws formulated by limited people, at all no truth, and the delusion, for example, laws of social development, is not enough for their adequate application. Therefore, similar application of tte will on the basis of laws can lead not to liberty, and to bondage that in the history was happening too often, especially in Russia.
On the other hand, if under the will to be understood the conscious desire of the person in the form of inducement to conscious management of the acts for achievement of the goals coinciding with his motives, or objectified requirements, as well as that the will - a product partly the genetic, but relating to the program of self-consciousness, and partly bringing up by surroundings, then the will, as well as the knowledge, cannot be as the cause of acts of the person.
The will is more the additional motivation, it induces the person to act with some persistence, determination, initiative, but the will by itself or in a combination to the knowledge instead of liberty can send the person to slavery to a subject or a idea, to which it forces him to go, will forces the person to make acts according to the chosen purpose, i.e. is not free, but forced. Not the will accepts the final decisions, it only promotes their achievement.
The will generally is a product of dissatisfaction of self-consciousness, and surroundings, but the will has not the direct relation, in particular, to conscious management of circumstances. The will may serve in the basic for overcoming of obstacles on the way to the purpose. The will is the aspiration into outside, and liberty cannot be outside of the person - it is not a gift.
The will maintains the activity of the person or suppresses it, but does not define. Therefore, it is necessary to the will to add liberty as self-defining category in acts of the person. And it turns again that liberty at all does not coincide neither with the will nor with the knowledge and that this such is unclear.
Liberty is what allows to the person according to his purposes to manipulate by the subjects of the outside world.
Liberty is already the deputy of God in this definition, permitting to the person to live, but as and God oneself, what is liberty - not known. The definition, as such, is absent here.
Liberty is the existence of possibility of a choice of options of an outcome of an event. Lack of a choice of options of an outcome of an event is equivalent to absence of liberty.
In this case "unhappy" liberty gets to dependence from a choice. You will choose not so or you do not see a choice, so there is no liberty at you? Here liberty is put in dependence on external circumstances. At such liberty the person would differ nothing from the computer which, besides, is able to choose better.
Liberty is one of types of manifestation of the randomness, guided by a free will (intention of will, conscious liberty) or by the stochastic law (unpredictability of an outcome of an event, the unconscious liberty), i.e. something opposite to necessity.
Here liberty is arbitrariness, grasped by will. If liberty is the opposition of necessity, people could not create accidentally the whole civilization and much that in it make not accidental, but consciously and purposefully. Much of what people do based on their needs which arise not randomly. Even desires of the person are not arbitrariness, and proceed from his representations which are formed by an environment.
Liberty is fear releasing the person from all conventionalities of a reality.
This definition reduces liberty to nothingness. It is not visible the person in this definition. Being exempted from conventionalities which represent public life, the human is exempted from self. Liberty to the person is not needed in this case.
Liberty is the person who is projecting freely himself on freely chosen purpose.
Here Sartre went strongly too far, having told three times about liberty, but without having defined it, having noted, however, that liberty and the free person - same. Certainly, without person in our world of liberty does not exist, but what after all forces the person "to project himself on freely chosen purpose"? Perhaps it also is the liberty? Sartre did not give the answer on this question.
It is curious that there is no precise definition of liberty. All of these definitions of liberty "beat around the bush". The feeling is created, that they define liberty like blind palpating different parts of an elephant: one, touching a trunk, says that the elephant is similar to a snake, another, feeling a foot, claims that the elephant reminds a column.
All these vague ideas of liberty point out that their authors do not know to what it can belong that it is actually and what is its mission.
This imitation of the search for the true meaning of liberty reminds the capture of a cat in a dark room in which it is absent.
In search of liberty the people, getting rid in life from some of the external obstacles and restrictions instantly are taken prisoner to others (and even often look for this captivity to absolve themselves of responsibility for the acts: sectarians, Party members, members of corporations) that clearly specifies absence of liberty outside: how many look for it there - won't find.
Indeed, how is possible to find liberty somewhere outside the person or in his physiological features, or in his mentality if it can be manifested only through his self-consciousness, and the foundation of liberty has been laid in holographic formations of the active as the opposition to the passive. Consciousness (the active) aims to manifest liberty, forming the passive owing to own activity, which doesn't allow the active to stop, i.e. to become in the passive and thereby to fall through in non-existence.
Therefore, the active (consciousness in the person) in beingness can't be stayed for a long time in these or those structures, in these or those conditions, in this or that order, follow this or that necessity, it aims to change them always, but isn't chaotic, and purposefully, with a favor for itself, more precisely, forming of other structures and relations that gives to it the own changes with accumulation of the appropriate experience in this development. Similar manifestation of the active (consciousness) among the passive is the primary source of liberty, and the activity in its expressions and actions in the person is unwillingness of stops, dissatisfaction with what is available, aspiration to changes, to new, i.e. - to development or other expression of oneself in this process.
Such conscious manifestation of the active is the greatest possible exactly in the person, because he has self-consciousness - it gives the most complete liberty. Any necessity cannot restrict this liberty on the contrary necessity is a support for the free expressions of the person, so how only on the basis of the known order the person can set consciously another order, reveal other regularities. But all it is required not in itself, but it means the accumulation of knowledge and abilities to go from one order to another, and so on successively for the development and the expression of consciousness in the changing conditions.
Thus, only necessity, or resistance of the environment give to consciousness the chance of manifestation of own activity through thoughts, feelings and actions in the process of overcoming this resistance - in the airless environment birds don't fly: absence of contradictions is the calm and kindness; but only in the struggle liberty can be manifested and thereby occur the infinite motion of consciousness forward.
So, the main feature of any active (alive), distinguishing it from the passive (lifeless) by the mandatory internal tension, is the expression of the dissatisfaction with what is available, thereby creating an incentive to search for better conditions: the active is forming something only in order that afterwards to destroy it, replacing the other - more, as this seems to it, suitable. This variable vector in the form of the opposite aspirations to creation and destruction certainly indicates a preference, given up to other before the established, that has as a basis the full update each position of a holographic projection by the subsequent position.
Therefore, liberty is constant aspiration to the release from one for creation of another, not necessarily better, but other.
However, let us ask ourselves the question: what is man in essence?
Apparently, the person is an animal that had found self somehow in the world, i.e. had comprehended in it own existence, thanks to what it has been able to separate self from the environment, adapting it already purposefully under self with smaller or bigger success, and being changed in this process of interaction with the environment much quicker, than the other organisms.
The greatest rates in this development the community of people reach in the frames a civilization, forming it at that level of development of self-consciousness when the last requires for itself bigger, than can give almost equilibrium coexistence with the environment (primitive-communal system).
Opportunities which are given by a civilization for an acceleration of development of the public relations of technologies, science and culture mean the constant growth of information flows, leading to time compression, so how own time of a civilization, or its "now", is a consequence of manifestation of information interaction of the active and the passive [see higher].
Inevitable compression of own time as a result leads any civilization to information collapse.
In place of the collapsed civilization come other civilizations, in which again are manifested somehow the person, and is repeated, but not literally, life cycle and decay of civilization, because the other option for the development of, apparently, doesn't exist at this level of self-consciousness in its interaction with the natural consciousness.
All this partly reminds the proceeding series of human lives, inasmuch with the death of the specific human beings the life doesn't come to an end; there appear and live approximately the same people.
Thus, both the person, and a civilization as the finite can't be self-sufficing, but are tools of infinite consciousness [3. Chapter 3].
The extremity of the person and his civilization doesn't allow to accomplish aspiration of the person to complete separation from the environment, to the release from it, it doesn't manage to dominate unconditionally over the environment, how doesn't manage to monks to get rid of own corporal shell completely.
Here can only be envied of the flora and fauna, which are poured naturally in the environment and which does not seek to break away from it, being in all completeness of sensations, which are inherent in them and compose their life. Thereby, they, and quite "happy" the fact that don't know about own death.
If, on the one hand, complete separation of the person from the environment is impossible, and on the other hand, is manifested his difference from other living beings, consisting in awareness self with all that it implies, then, probably, liberty (release) for the person can be expressed only in his aspirations somehow escape out of fetters of all that surrounds him with that difference from the fly, which trembles in a web, that his main aspirations are conscious (are free), and have the base in some eternal and depth, which is behind beingness, and along with that - inherent to beingness, moreover, is incapable to be eternal and steady without beingness like a fish without water. In this regard the person is the highest. self-conscious expression of the active in Creation, without which the last loses the meaning of existence.
If further to analyze that is a person as the single free being in beingness known to us, then it is necessary to mark the following.
Thingness components of a body of the person (lifeless) and things around him (the environment) give to the person in his consciousness a support, provide a natural order, filling surroundings and alternating in time. Of them are formed a fairly convenient place for the person.
Along with that things create the permanent resistance to actions of the person hindering manifestations of his activity and not allowing to the person to be rid owing to the prevailing habits from a everyday situation.
Thus, things are the indispensable means, "food" for human mind and abilities. Thanks to ingenuity, derivative mainly from self-consciousness, people in communities are being engaged by the bringing the things to such combinations, which can be more suitable and even favorable to them. For example, unlike other living beings, the personhas been capable to compare fire not only with a devastating fire (wildfire) and disastrous tongues of flame, but and with cooking and heating.
That is, the conscious actions of the person on the basis of cogitations and comparisons, as it appears, can quite result in other understanding of things and phenomena, exempting him from these or those misconceptions and leading to overcoming the existing order.
The natural-living essence of the person provides his communication with the environment in framework the sense organs which are available for him, i.e. by means of sensations in the form of action of instinctive and reflex programs.
Self-consciousness of the person, on the contrary, separates the person from the environment, but thanks to this it allows to take a detached view on it and on himself from the side, and to estimate own opportunities to more or less plan change of both the environment, and himself.
As can be seen, all most important in Creation is aggregated in the person: and the passive (things) and the active (consciousness of both levels), but is lost infinity of existence.
This loss is explained with the fact that the infinite - in this case consciousness - can be expressed only through the finite, i.e. - by means of some kind of "ruptures" in infinity, otherwise the infinite isn't capable to exit out of nonexistence.
In this interaction of the infinite with the finite over and over again consciousness in continuous updating and development remains eternal and Creation doesn't lose the stability.
Thus, any finite (the person, civilizations, planets, universes - everything, except consciousness - is exactly that, in what only consciousness can discretely be implemented.
Therefore. consciousness in the person (in beingness) as if localizes self in the restrictions, determined by it, only to overcome them as the active, being exempted from one for the sake of formation of another, just as one holographic pattern of a unmanifested infinity is updated by the next.
So overcoming restrictions within the finite structures is liberty of consciousness based on own inescapable activity, which is expressed in the person preferentially in his consciousness, and in remaining living beings - in the spontaneous activity, which anyway is becoming complicated in the application to changing conditions in process of development of the living beings.
In conclusion it is necessary to mark that in the dual Creation there is nothing, except the active and the passive, which are being disconnected and united in the eternal interaction, owing to the form-building abilities which are available for the active, which allow through information influence to perform "building" of beingness from things by discrete update of a holographic projection of unmanifested infinity. This beingness is evolving through time and space, in which can be determined and exist the living beings, including people.
For the human consciousness the changing world pattern in the form of the phenomena, but not essences of the deep levels, is formed not by sensations and not by thinking, though they are means, but it, in general, is a product of processing of information, coming to the person, similar to that which occurs in the computer or in any living being without self-consciousness; the difference consists only the fact that human consciousness is capable to separate self from reality and to interact with it already on this new basis - a basis of own self-consciousness, purposefully using memory, cognitive abilities, language, different communications, imagination, experimental data, and all this is against the background of emotions, but not by means of only the software or instinctive and reflex actions respectively.
Therefore, can be noted that every human possesses the highest form of matter from all available forms precisely because he is self-conscious being with the highest possible level of liberty, the presence and the manifestation of which he understands but cannot explain its source and mission.
Eventually, the person isn't subordinated to anybody and himself disposes by self, since he initially himself in own consciousness "throws" himself only into such world, in which he can purposefully be implemented so, as he only can in the conditions of the resisting environment, including and his direct competitors. The person differs exactly in this from all remaining living beings, also having consciousness, but with the lower level, which only adapts to the environment, formed by them with the participation of a single consciousness, - from bacteria to the highest mammals.
The person, thanks to the main property - self-consciousness, is free even in death, which is available to him practically at any moment of life, inasmuch he knows about it, though fears it. But in certain circumstances the person is decided on death, unlike all remaining living beings, who, without understanding itself, but possessing sensations, are never capable to refuse from them voluntarily.
Another relation to death on comparing with all remaining living beings is the result of the conscious dissatisfaction oneself, inherent to the person, leading sometimes to a premature end owing to an insuperable rupture of circumstances, created by him, and circumstances, wished him.
The person from all living beings, famous to us who create themselves and the surrounding by means of own sense organs and the centers processing information, is the single being, who comprehends self in individual and collective actions, i.e. a being, who understands that it is in the frames of time.
But the person doesn't understand that the information pulses (packets of information), received by him through sense organs from an unmanifested infinity, are converted into his own time and his own surroundings within the general (external) time, formed by all set of the living beings, connected in consciousness, but along with that separated in a holographic projection of an unmanifested infinity. Therefore, he "places" himself in "external" time which he watches directly in connection with daily allowance, seasonal and to annual changes of surroundings, without noting the often very considerable oscillations of own time [3. Chapter 2].
Whatever it was, in information interaction of consciousness with things, manifested in beingness, is expressed essence of consciousness of all living beings, consisting not in intellect and not in sensations, which are just some means, but in own inescapable activity.
This activity is the main property, which doesn't allow to stop to each living being, and in the beings, understanding themselves, activity is manifested in conscious dissatisfaction by themselves and surroundings: the person has no limit to any ideas or desires (needs). Therefore, the person can't follow to the same order, but always aims to change it, and it is unimportant how this at he turns out. The main thing - there are changes during which the person, more precisely, his personal consciousness gets experience and development together with the changing life, new shades of feelings, comprehension of these changes with all excitements on this occasion.
Exactly in these eternal aspirations of human consciousness to a new on the basis of its enduring dissatisfaction with self and surroundings is expressed liberty, or action of releasing and creating the forces of consciousness.
The aspiration to violation of the customary order for human consciousness adjoins to aspiration to creation of a new order. Actually, in these step and contradictory activities consist human lifetime, in which consciousness finds itself and loses, and then - again finds. And so everything goes unceasingly - from one life to following.
Liberty is the inescapable product of activity, which is manifested in actions of the person in life as the state of a dissatisfaction of consciousness by oneself, which is realized into development of ways of own change by means of exposure on existing beingness taking into account counteraction of beingness.
In other words, the everlasting dissatisfaction of consciousness with itself evokes its aspiration to the change oneself in the frame of own existence in the person in the conditions of the resisting environment.
If living conditions do not allow the person to dominate completely over circumstances, nobody and nothing prevents him to strive for this: the approximation to an ideal is also, in a sense, finding of larger liberty.
Known expression: "At last I broke loose" means transition of the person to the intense activity, i.e. the blocked aspirations start being implemented. It is not necessary to think that liberty can be outside, round you. If there are no aspirations, be all to your services around, but anything it will not be necessary for you. The rich idlers who are quickly tired from life know about this well.
Bibliography
1. Nizovtsev Y. M. Everything and Nothingness. 2016. [Electronic resource]. Access mode: www.litres.ru. Amazon
2. Nizovtsev Y. M. In what, how and for what liberty is acting. 2014. [Electronic resource]. Access mode: www.litres.ru. Amazon
3. Nizovtsev Y. M. Miracles in a sieve. 2016. [Electronic resource]. Access mode: www.litres.ru. Amazon