Низовцев Юрий Михайлович
The finite as a way of realizing the infinite in beingness

Самиздат: [Регистрация] [Найти] [Рейтинги] [Обсуждения] [Новинки] [Обзоры] [Помощь|Техвопросы]
Ссылки:
Школа кожевенного мастерства: сумки, ремни своими руками Типография Новый формат: Издать свою книгу
 Ваша оценка:
  • Аннотация:
    The picture of Creation, presumably, is based on a frequency-information form, which, in turn, hides interaction of the visible by us the finite in time and the invisible infinity out of time, whose representatives and acting agents are, respectively, living beings and a single consciousness-hologram, directly holding Creation in a state of infinite change.
  
  
  Key words: information, change, finite, infinity, time, consciousness, hologram, alive, person.
  
  The development that everyone cares about is merely a truncated version of the change, periodically necessary to avoid the stagnation, repetition or regression in the eternal process of change.
  The change itself, however, occurs infinitely, whereas the development is incapable of this, since at best it would be reduced to a bad infinity, losing not only its quality but also the possibility of change in a new way, that is, forced to limit itself to a repetition of the past or the object of development would disintegrate.
  One of the most ancient religions-Hinduism-came to this conclusion by having recognized the cyclical rotation of everything with repetition of the past, thereby having stated the impossibility of the development of a person and mankind endlessly.
  Indeed, it's difficult to argue with this, if only because of the limited resources of mankind, although today's futurologists, while arbitrarily rejecting this fact, believe that a person and mankind have the potential to develop continuously and infinitely in one way or another.
  In particular, Arkady and Boris Strugatsky, in their novel "The Waves Extinguish the Wind" [1], described this development as follows:
  "Any Reason - whether technological, or in accordance with Rousseau's ideas, or even heroic - in the process of first-order evolution goes from a state of maximum separation (savagery, mutual embitternment, wretchedness of emotions, distrust) to a condition of association, greatest possible at preservation of the individual (friendliness, high culture of the relations, altruism, the neglect by achievable). This process copes laws biological, biosocial and specifically social. It is well studied and is of interest to us only here so far as leads to a question: and what's next?
  Having laid aside romantic trills of history of vertical progress, we find only two real, essentially differing opportunities for Reason. Or a stop, self-complacency, short circuit on, loss of interest in the physical world. Or entering on the way of the evolution of the second order on the way of evolution planned and controlled, on the way to Monokosm.
  The synthesis of reasons is inevitable. It gives an innumerable number of new facets of the perception of the world, and this leads to an incredible increase in the quantity and, most importantly, the quality of information available for absorption, which, in turn, leads to a decrease in suffering up to a minimum and an increase in joy up to a maximum. The concept of "home" is expanding to Universe scales. A new metabolism arises, and as a result of it, life and health become almost eternal. The age of the individual becomes comparable with the age of space objects in the complete absence of accumulation of fatigue. The individual of Monokosma does not need creators. He oneself both the creator, and the consumer of culture. On a water drop he is capable not only to recreate an image of the ocean, but also the whole world of the beings inhabiting it, including reasonable. And all this at continuous, unsatiable sensor hunger.
  Each new individual arises as a work of the syncretic art: it is created by physiologists, and genetics, and engineers, and psychologists, aesthetics, educators and philosophers of Monocosm. This process, of course, takes several tens of Earth years and, of course, is the most fascinating and honorable ...
  TO CREATE, WITHOUT DESTROYING!" - here the slogan of Monocosm.
  Monocosm cannot but consider the way of development and own modus vivendi only true ...
  First: the entry of the mankind on the way of evolution of the second order means practically the transformation Hомо sapiens in Wanderer (superman).
  Second: most likely, not every Homo sapiens is suitable for such a transformation.
  ... the search, selection and preparation for incorporation of ripe individuals cannot but be accompanied by phenomena and events accessible to an attentive observer. It is possible to expect, for example, developing of mass phobias, new messianic teachings, appearance of people with unusual abilities, inexplicable disappearances of people, sudden emergence in people of new talents as if by magic, etc.".
  With the advent of the artificial intelligence, the considerations of futurologists about the transit of mankind to a new state, it would seem, was reinforced by the possibility of combining the reason of a person and mankind with the artificial intelligence, which, indeed, is capable of bringing obvious benefits.
  However, if you dig deeper, then this unity of a person with the machine intelligence that does not have consciousness, and therefore is able to work only in accordance with logic and commands in strict accordance with the programs invested in it, excludes the creative thinking from his side.
  Moreover, the replacement of workers in almost all branches of material production, the service sector, and even in the sphere of the intellectual activity by the computer, or artificial intelligence not only throws these workers to the sidelines of life, devaluing it for them, but also quickly makes them, in essence, the blockheads.
  The phenomenal stupidity of these well-educated and talkative futurologists is astonishing, misleading the cultural public into believing that reason is capable of infinite development precisely because there is nothing higher than it, and that, while incomparably superior to everything else, it cannot cease its conscious improvement. Therefore, it is simply forced to perpetually engage in the process of cognition and, furthermore, to perfect itself in a person, for the sake of all possible accomplishments, endlessly.
  These futurologists would do well to remember that in the world we know, everything is finite, beginning with the human life, the existence of civilization, planets, and even the universe. In other words, if there was a beginning, there will be an end. And nothing can be done about that in our material world.
  ***
  This circumstance, unlike the ideas of futurologists, fixated on this, in their opinion, a purely material creation as a person, almost all ministers of various cults understood, inventing as shepherds for their sheep intangible oases like paradise and hell, and also pleasant nirvana, in which, however, the personality disappears, merging with a certain whole, which can be useful for the whole, but not for a personality disappearing irretrievable, which, of course, is indifferent for an ant, but not for a person with all her life achievements and principles.
  Interestingly, the delusional ideas about the coming of mankind due to the continuous development of reason to universal goodness and harmony also take the possession of the smartest people recognized as great. For example, everyone knows Karl Marx, the consequences of idea which of the inevitable coming of communism is still being to be disentangled.
  However, the simple and modest Russian librarian N. F. Fedorov, who had lived in Moscow for over a hundred years ago, will easily give a considerable head start to the visionary futurologists, as well as the cunning clergy, and even the great Karl Marx a considerable head start, in the deed the development of reason and mankind.
  He has advanced his ideas on the development of a person and mankind so far that there's nowhere else to go.
  This thinker decided that since "war, the controversy, competition, and struggle in general" [2. Question 8] kill all living things, yet at the same time, only a person possesses the highest reason, all things must be brought under the control of this reason. Specifically, we must ensure for all rational beings, past and present, a never-ending stream of universal happiness, and at the same time immortality, through the universal resurrection, with the help of science, of all the dead, from the moment decent reason appears in living beings.
  Further, he proposes to unite this entire crowd of former dead with those still living and to arrange for them a wonderful life and the possibility of permanent creativity, again, thanks to science, which should certainly cope with both the resurrection and with ensuring the further existence of this renewed, abundant, but stable in numbers thanks to the immortality of mankind, spreading it throughout the universe, which, of course, in Fedorov"s opinion, can only be controlled by reason, and only people have it, and they cannot escape the solution of this noble task, harmonizing everything that exists, and thereby ensuring their own well-being without any cataclysms: "The task of the human race consists in the conversion of everything unconscious, which is done by itself, which is born into a conscious, bright, real, universal, personal resurrection" [3, part 2, p. 13]. Here your own personality will not go anywhere, and for all other personalities who can be counted and this account remains by unchanged due to their immortality will be as good as it can be.
  True, Fedorov did not think carefully about what people will do in cold and endless space - and there is nothing to do there, and they will have to settle on the planets again and do the same things that Fedorov considered vile due to wars, competition and other misfortunes in the course of the progress he hates, including a short life span when you really do not have time to undertake up anything.
  Today's futurologists are mere children compared to Fedorov-he didn't even forget about the dead, thereby having encompassed the entire human race from its inception. Futurologists, however, simply assert, without considering universal resurrection, that reason is simply obliged to develop infinitely in the boundless cosmos, as the Strugatsky brothers wrote.
  In this, they, still, have reached the understanding that the reason in the human shell cannot develop unknown where, having outflanked our shepherds, since in the ethereal and incomprehensible where located otherworldly it will have nothing to do. In addition, for the reasons of futurologists, the immortality of man in development should be well materially provided.
  The situation with the pastors is also clear. They do not claim on mandatory of the indefinite development of a person and mankind, admitting to apocalypse, heaven, and hell in certain denominations, and they don't particularly comment on the ultimate outcome, except, admittedly, the arrival of universal happiness from who knows where. That is, the infinite development of reason doesn't particularly interest them, but universal well-being does, since they are forced to focus on the vast, half-starved masses of ordinary people, not well-fed intellectuals.
  As for the futurologists who are optimistic about the human reason, they completely forgot that this mind appeared not so long ago compared to billions of years of existence of the rest not too reasonable, in their opinion, the living beings.
  So, since there was a beginning, then there will be an end. That is, the endless development of the reason cannot be ensured, but they want to and therefore they have to fantasize, and hang the rest on my ears for all this grace.
  ***
  If, despite the speculations of futurologists and their ilk, a person, with all his reason, as a finite creature, is not threatened by infinity, then a thorny question arises: what for is this remarkable and diverse reason needed at all, if, furthermore, this reason is finite even within the human race?
  So far, only religion has attempted to answer this question, stubbornly insisting to this day on a person's transition to another, improved state for his reason-the afterlife, if there is no the material world there?
  It's impossible to dispute the fact of this inevitable transit, although the improved state of the afterlife is imperceptible from here. And if a person dies, what kind of state will they attain beyond the grave?
  But then again, believing in the impossible is pleasant because one always yearns for something far from unpleasant. In other words, the reason here gives way to stupidity, which also testifies to the impossibility of reason developing without stupidity. And why is such imperfect reason necessary, especially if it will somehow manage to reach the infinite goodness?
  But before answering this insidious question, we must recall the guillotine of Hume, who a few hundred years ago clearly explained to all literate that what is does not entail what ought: "I have observed that in every ethical theory that I have hitherto encountered, the author has been reasoning for some time in the usual way, establishing the existence of God, or sets forth his observations concerning human affairs, and suddenly, to my surprise, I find that instead of the usual copula used in sentences, namely, "is" or "is not," I do not meet with a single sentence in which "ought" or "ought not" would not be used as a copula. This substitution takes place unnoticed, but nevertheless it is of the utmost importance. Since this "ought" or "ought not" expresses some new relation or assertion, the latter must necessarily be taken into account and explained, and at the same time the basis must be given for what seems quite incomprehensible, namely, how this new relation can be a deduction from others that are completely different from it" [4].
  So that, if you really want something, despite the apparent imperative of realizing it, you must first think, experiment, calculate, compare, and only then demonstrate yourself and your ideas, transforming them into what is ought on an adequate basis, or, conversely, point to a basis according to which it shouldn't be so.
  Indeed, based solely on how the world is structured in accordance with objects perceived by the senses, it is impossible to justify what people should strive for without gross logical errors, since the human senses are extremely limited in both quantity and quality, producing, on the one hand, a one-sided, or rather, purely human, picture of the environment. On the other hand, there is no other picture, and one must seek a more or less adequate solution to a given problem through experimentation, combined with reflection.
  Therefore, we should turn to the reliable facts already obtained and, as Hume pointed out, not rush into decisions that seem promising or even necessary at the moment, in particular, the idea that people should strive with all their might and means toward communism, space, or heaven, since they alone possess the highest reason that is undoubtedly capable of discerning whether it is better to go here or there. For some reason, everyone forgets that, in addition to reason, a person has no less stupidity.
  ***
  Here's where another problem arises: experience shows that, contrary to Descartes' maxim, "I think, therefore I exist" [5], which he applied only to a person, The highest mammals are quite capable of reasoning, albeit only to avoid perishing and, preferably, to find a more comfortable existence in a particular environment. And they are informed of existence primarily by sensations, according to which, for example, an amoeba doesn't climb into boiling water, rather than by the reason, which is activated only by processing incoming information from the senses in the form of more or less lengthy reasoning.
  As is well known, thinking is the result of receiving, processing, storing, and transmitting information. This process is supported by the senses, an information processing center of varying complexity with its ability to store and process information, and various signaling systems.
  But, oddly enough, an artificial intelligence possesses the same capabilities, possessing sensors for receiving information, an information processing unit with corresponding memory, and devices for transmitting information. This fact has so perplexed some scientists that they have become so warmly attached to artificial intelligence that they have elevated it to the rank of a thinking being.
  Ridiculous as it may seem, these scientists recognized as a thinking being, essentially, an advanced adding machine, completely unconcerned with its own existence because it lacks feelings.
  Nevertheless, it turns out that thinking, if we understand it as the process of information processing, is generally relevant to a person, other living beings, and an artificial intelligence.
  Moreover, it must be determined whether artificial intelligence actually thinks or simply functions like a machine configured in a certain way.
  In addition, it, like a machine, can be turned on and off from the outside.
  Therefore, it is necessary to determine in this regard the difference a person from animals and an artificial intelligence.
  ***
  As for the difference between thinking a person and animals, it can be determined as follows.
  The thinking of the highest mammals and a person is essentially the same, judging by their behavior in many situations and their IQ (intelligence quotient) is not much lower than that of the average person.
  What, then, is the difference?
  It must be assumed that the difference between them and a person lies not in thinking per se, but in the direction of thinking.
  All these mammals, though the highest, think only of preserving the sensations they receive from their environment. This is precisely what their reason are directed toward. They are uninterested in anything else, as they do not find the meaning of existence in the reason. They use it merely as a means of preserving sensations by adapting themselves to the environment in the most advantageous way to obtain the most pleasurable sensations, passing on the ability to experience pleasurable sensations to their offspring, and also, they use the reason.to ward off external threats.
  In other words, their program of actions is limited to the preservation of sensations within themselves, and their understanding of the environment occurs only through adaptation to it based on instincts and reflexes, using trials and errors, rather than logical analysis, which is unique to a person, since for analytical and synthetic conclusions, people mentally utilize verbal information, which is absent in animals, while these wordless creatures must retain sensations based solely on instincts and reflexes.
  Thus, it is not thinking that determines the recognition of its own existence by any living being other than a person. On the contrary, the aspiration to exist in the form of perceiving sensations inevitably prompts considerations about how to preserve sensations.
  The result of this kind of information consumption by a living being is the transformation of this dynamic element of the environment into a subject of action, capable of being aware of its presence in the environment - that is, aware of its existence, responding to changes in its sensations by developing considerations about how to proceed in order to continue existing. Thus, willy-nilly, we must recognize this reaction as thinking, albeit a forced one, produced solely for the purpose of adapting to the environment.
  Unlike the highest mammals, the human thinking is aimed not only at adaptive responses to the environment but also at its possible subjugation. Achieving this goal requires the cognition of the environment.
  The effective cognition of the environment, in turn, requires the development of verbal communication and conscious processing of this environment, which is called labor. To facilitate this, these new descendants of the highest mammals gradually developed, in addition to adaptive thinking, based on instincts and reflexes, the ability to think logically. They also refined the combination of logical thinking and instinctive use of information, which allows for the initiation of arbitrary, or illogical, thinking in the context of goal-setting, which is called creative thinking.
  This type of thinking, aided by techniques, found over time, and indicated, in general, by intuition, proved capable of quickly lifting a person from the circle of the known into the realm of acquiring non-obvious knowledge, so necessary for the discovery of the new in the process of cognition.
  Apparently, the human capacity for both logical analysis and creativity inspired Descartes to formulate the maxim: "I think, therefore I exist." The validity of this maxim is undeniable only if he meant by it the developed human capacity to alter existing reality through meaningful decisions, revealing the mysteries of one's own existence within the framework of goals possible at a given level of development-something other natural beings are incapable of, content with what they have.
  ***
  Regarding the differences between the human reasoning and the functioning of an artificial intelligence, the following can be said.
  If we assume that an artificial intelligence thinks, then its thinking is always confined within the framework of the formal logic, which is nothing more than a consequence of the programs embedded within it. It is capable of solving problems posed to it from the outside after it is activated, within a set limited by those same programs.
  People and animals are subjective, representing beings that function without the external guidance, whereas an artificial intelligence is completely influenced by external sources, which program it to solve problems within its capabilities and supply it with the energy to do so. In other words, without external influence, an artificial intelligence, created by external forces, becomes a meaningless and useless thing.
  It follows that the main difference between the artificial intelligence and living beings, including a person, is that the artificial intelligence lacks feelings, although it does have information-receiving sensors.
  In other words, the artificial intelligence is not conscious of its actions because it lacks a direct connection to the environment, on which it is independent, obeying only its own programs, which are input into it from the outside. Therefore, it does not think, but functions mechanically within the framework of externally assigned tasks, according to specific programs, without understanding the purpose of these tasks, and only when connected to a power source.
  For example, the artificial intelligence, when solving a given problem, doesn't consider how its solution will affect itself, but it can point out certain negative consequences that arise during the process. In other words, the concept of life is nonexistent for it. However, it can imitate it so well that even more than one scientist believes it to be a thinking being.
  The lack of conscious, independent actions in the environment for the artificial intelligence indicates that it is completely devoid of consciousness.
  These differences between a person and the artificial intelligence allow us to closely address the so-called "hard problem of consciousness," formulated by D. Chalmers [6], namely, why and how physical processes in the brain are accompanied by subjective experiences.
  Subjective experiences are nothing more than feelings, or specific sensations. They are absent from the artificial intelligence, since it operates not within the framework of sensations, but only within a digital environment, conveying the results of its analysis of incoming information to the consumer in the form of understandable symbols, for example, in verbal form. Meanwhile, any living being, not just a person, is forced to represent the environment in which it independently operates not as symbols, but as objects for its own understanding, for example, representing vibrations of one frequency as heat, another as light, a third as sound, and so on.
  Thereby, living beings are aware of the fact of their existence by converting arbitrarily changing external and internal information influences and signals into sensations, which are the product of automatic decoding of frequency-type data entering their senses, and they are able to find the most pleasant sensations and evade unpleasant or disastrous sensations, that is, experiencing them and thinking how to do it in the process of adapting to the environment, which is existence for them.
  Naturally, for them this process is purely individual and is accompanied by subjective experiences, for example, in the form of joy from victory over an enemy or regret from one's own decrepitude or the sensation of the scent of a female, stimulating males at a certain time to reproduce, accumulating the corresponding life experience, which simply cannot be in the artificial intelligence, but is given to living beings through sensations, which are the main sign of the penetration of consciousness into them, whereas thinking, which is mainly a process of information processing, may well be dependent, for example, if this process occurs in a digital environment during the functioning of the artificial intelligence.
  ***
  All above facts indicate that, in contrast to the thinking of the artificial intelligence, which is in fact an electrophysical imitation of thinking in the form of the functioning of artificial intelligence using a digital environment in accordance with programs introduced into it that do not allow it to demonstrate independence in its actions, the basis of the thinking and actions of all living beings are the sensations, thanks to which the most developed beings gain the ability to recognize their existence in time, that is, they begin to understand that their bodies are being influenced and they, to a certain extent, are under control something external, however, without depriving this most developed being in the form of a person of independence and even the arbitrariness in thinking and behavior,, as if covering the human body so that without it becomes inanimate.
  And this mysterious externality, which cannot be directly detected by any means, they designated the immortal soul. Science now calls it consciousness, but assumes-completely unfounded-that it is a product of the brain. The inadequacy of this idea is clear from the fact that even the simplest organisms, lacking a brain, are capable of sensation and, therefore, cannot fail to possess consciousness, the main sign of whose presence in the organism is sensation, as demonstrated above.
  Curiously, the programmer who controls the artificial intelligence would also seem like an incomprehensible soul to that intelligence if it could sense things, rather than simply function according to the programs programmed into it. This is because something seemingly emerging from nowhere nonetheless compels it to function, turning it on by its appearance, that is, bringing it into existence, and turning off, as it were, mortifies it, removing out of existence.
  This comparison again demonstrates the difference between the most complex non-living thing and the simplest living thing, which for the living consists precisely in transforming incoming information into sensations, not electrical signals in digital space.
  Nevertheless, the similarity between, for example, a changing image of a person's surroundings and a changing image on a television screen-that is, a virtual image of the same reality, obtained by converting information packets passing through a cable at a specific frequency and decoded by the corresponding blocks, resulting in a television image-is undeniable.
  However, everything that happens on this television image is nothing more than virtual, whereas the frequency nature of the signals entering a living being through the senses gives it a real world in which it can act with full responsibility for its actions, rather than simply observe.
  But the most interesting aspect of this frequency process for living beings, which distinguishes them from the artificial intelligence, is the comparative slowness with which they process external signals received through the sensory organs of any living being due to their use of electrochemical signal transmission, which is being carried, in particular, through the human neural circuits.
  This process is as follows.
  The biological, not purely electrical, like a computer, structure of the brain is as follows. Signals in the brain are transmitted not electrically, but chemically through neurotransmitters in the junctions between neurons - synapses, each tiny neuron has from 199 thousand to a million synaptic connections. Signal routes are determined by active fields of the cortex, which coordinate various functions of body parts, and the formation of new synapses is the basis of long-term memory and creative thinking. The instability of synapses, that is, the random nature of their formation and destruction, can make human thinking arbitrary with certain efforts and thereby lead him to completely new connections and relationships, which makes it possible for creativity to manifest itself in the flow of thoughts.
  Regarding the connection between the brain and the computer, the ultra-fine energetic and physiological limitations of signal transmission in the brain make this unification impossible.
  Thus, the technical basis of the human creative thinking is the randomness inherent in its information processing center, which allows it, unlike the artificial intelligence, to transcend the boundaries of formal logical thinking, but, unlike other living beings, but a person is also able to go beyond thinking based on instincts and reflexes alone, which is influenced by random changes in the genotype, which are usually external in nature.
  The result of this comparatively slow processing of information, compared to its processing by the artificial intelligence, is the automatic exclusion by the information processing center of the pause between the successive incoming packets of information, which in the consciousness of any living being merge into a single stream, similar to what happens in a movie theater, where the eyes do not have time to notice the gap between frames of the film scrolling in the projector, and we watch a continuous action on the screen during the film session, thereby falling into the proper time of this action.
  Roughly the same thing that happens in a movie theater occurs in all living beings when processing information arriving through the sensory organs to the information processing center-the pause between pulse signals is eliminated. As a result of this loss of pause, living beings automatically enter into a continuous action for them, that is, into their own current time, which lasts until death, however, fitting into the external (astronomical) time common to all living beings, since they constantly form it in their entirety.
  Unlike modern physicists, who consider time to be a form of the course of certain processes or a condition for the possibility of change, Aristotle more adequately formulated the concept of external (astronomical or calendar) time, indicating that it is associated with the "movement of the celestial sphere" and is, in this regard, objective. However, Aristotle has also noted that "if time is a measure of motion, then this presupposes number, for where there is measure, there is number, and number must be counted by someone" [7]. In other words, Aristotle has hinted here that time is recorded only by consciousness. In fact, this is equivalent to stating the problematic nature of time's existence outside of consciousness.
  I. Kant, in essence, has agreed with Aristotle's hint that time does not exist outside of consciousness: "Time is not something objective and real..., but an objective condition, by the nature of the human mind necessary for the coordination of sensually perceived things according to a certain law, and the pure contemplation." [8].
  Let us note, in addition to the above remarks on time by these unusually insightful philosophers, that a certain subjectivity of current time is confirmed by the fact of its deceleration and acceleration both for persons [see, for example, 9] and for their communities [see, for example, 10].
  The basis of this phenomenon of the dependence of time on the consciousness of living beings is the automatic conversion of information packets coming into the sense organs into the current time for each living being, in which it can already live fully, because only time generates events and life collisions, imperceptibly accelerating or slowing down for a living being during its life both due to various collisions and as a result of age-related changes in its own body [9].
  Thus, time, produced by living beings in the manner described above, flows smoothly and habitually for them, providing them with space in which they can move and change against the background and surroundings of inanimate objects. This world itself, no longer frequency-based but objective, represents a constantly renewing reality both as a whole and in its particulars, since at the core of this reality lies a hologram [see, for example, 11]. However, a hologram is of a frequency nature. Therefore, wave-like, ultra-high-frequency formations outside of time, carrying the corresponding information in their harmonics, are converted by living beings into both the aforementioned types of time-general (calendar) and own (individual)-creating for them a "solid" reality in the manner described above, in which they can reproduce and exist in conditions suitable for their organic consistency, as we observe on our planet.
  These finite-term beings form communities that develop in their own current time in different ways in the general astronomical time, but with a certain acceleration due to their dissatisfaction [see, for example, 12] in their own consciousness with what is, striving for more pleasant sensations both qualitatively and quantitatively, which stimulates them to an increasingly diverse interaction with the environment, which not only develops and complicates them, but the consequence of this, a completely natural process, is the expansion of information flows, capturing living beings both individually and in their communities, condensing their own time at the greatest pace for the most complex creatures in composition, functions and behavior - people.
  In particular, this condensation, or the acceleration of own time within astronomical time, is clearly visible in the history of civilization if we note the main phases of its development in units of calendar time.
  The slave system, which replaced the primitive communal organization of human societies, which spanned tens of thousands of years, lasted only a few thousand years until the transition to a feudal system of economic management.
  During the feudal era, the development of civilization accelerated even more compared to the period of slavery, spanning just over a thousand years in Europe.
  Capitalism spanned several centuries of history-from the 17th century to the 21st century-having accelerated the development of civilization several times faster than feudalism.
  With the end of the capitalist era, civilization's own time, as a finite entity, comes to an end at the so-called singularity point, where its time, having been condensed to the extreme, is nullified at this point due to information collapse, that is, the inability of people, due to their limited resources, to "digest" ever-increasing flows of information.
  True, some remnants of the population of a collapsed civilization may, after some time, attempt to restore it, climbing out of the ensuing savagery, sometimes not without success, which regularly happens on all exoplanets, and, as archaeology shows from surviving artifacts, has also happened repeatedly on our planet. But mankind again falls into the same accelerating information flow, ending for it in the same collapse, etc., which means the discrete existence of civilizations even in favorable conditions for their development.
  This process itself also quite convincingly demonstrates that finite mankind, in these discrete manifestations, which are never statistically uniform, repeatedly gives eternal life through these very diverse manifestations with their endless changes to a single consciousness of a hologram, which is outside of time and along with that it is present in own time of every person, and indeed every living being.
  That is, living beings not only form time, keeping Creation in a state of constant change without falling into chaos or non-existence, but also give a single consciousness-hologram of Creation the eternal life.
  ***
  For this reason, living beings, representing consciousness (active) in beingness, are those finites, but reappearing again and again, elements of Creation, which in their intermittent infinity provides a constant change of beingness, fluctuating from progress to stagnation, turning from it into regression, but then returning to progressive changes.
  In other words, the finite living beings in their beingness by their more or less conscious activity, prohibit the law of non-decreasing entropy that applies only to things in closed systems, translating them into endless change.
  By this, living beings automatically provide an opportunity for themselves in beingness to change forever in their discrete ups and downs, giving a single consciousness of the hologram not some kind of nirvana common to all individual forms of consciousness outside of time, which is actually non-existence, but placing this single consciousness in its particles in the continuous course of events and relationships that occur forever.
  The descent of Creation into oblivion is opposed only by the finite living, locally developing in its own time here, but degrading there, however not disappearing, but resuming for the inevitable new development and the subsequent fall, etc.
  As for the development of alive, it continues until the emergence of the human civilization, which is nevertheless interrupted by the degradation of both a person and the entire system, but then resumes again to a certain point.
  This oscillatory process of change in the finite living beings proceeds endlessly, without literally repeating itself, since the number of possible changes in living beings in relation to their lives is infinite, despite the fact that the external form of the development and degradation of life remains unchanged.
  This process is explained by the fact that the active element in the form of living beings always strives for more pleasant sensations, not being satisfied with what exists, but seeking conditions that allow for the attainment of ever more varied pleasures in various forms, changing and becoming more complex within these forms. Then, having reached the limit of its adaptation to the environment, it begins to adapt this environment to itself, gradually organizing it as it needs for a more interesting and fulfilling life, as far as possible, thereby reducing local entropy.
  All this culminates in the formation of a technological civilization, which, in its development, captures ever greater information flows, which, like a boomerang, intensively influence the development of its finite representatives.
  However, the biological nature of these representatives limits the absorption and effective use of these flows, making further development and improvement of both them and civilization impossible.
  Furthermore, living beings, who shape their own existence in the present time by converting packets of information, which represent harmonics of ultra-high-frequency hologram vibrations, receive increasingly distorted information as the information flows increase.
  The fact is that, purely statistically, ultrahigh-frequency vibrations that are converted into objects of beingness through living beings cannot be ideal, giving certain failures or sometimes overlapping each other, despite the fact, that a holographic projection of a timeless infinity is on the whole the stable and harmonious formation. In this regard, the incoming information cannot but be distorted to one degree or another.
  As a result, all objects of beingness, both individually and during their interaction, cannot but deviate from a given functioning to one degree or another.
  In particular, timing of existence of each object of beingness in a certain form with a specific content, including the active (living) one, is limited by the presence of inevitable failures in its ultrahigh-frequency holographic basis, which can be interpreted as an increase in entropy in a given object, limiting its stay in a certain form in beingness.
  In other words, the order in beingness, subject to certain laws, cannot be carried out unambiguously, being lost in moments here or there, creating one or another type of chaos, which can increase and decrease depending on the possibility of correcting the situation, which is carried out by living beings directly or with their help consciously or not.
  ***
  So, what for all this happening in this seemingly artificial world of the current time within the framework of "solid" reality, where these finite living beings are capable of living their allotted time, and is there any meaning to their existence, if we try to answer in more detail?
  As noted above, any living being is alive because it has been inhabited for a certain period by an invisible consciousness.
  Consciousness itself cannot manifest oneself without living beings, especially without the people in who it's particularly interested, due to its ultra-high-frequency nature, which does not allow it to be present directly as a subject of action in the current time, which is being formed on the basis on relatively low-frequency streams carrying information.
  Therefore, to enter the living world of events, which is impossible outside of the current time, consciousness has to interact with the environment through an object of beingness, structured in a certain way-necessarily organic in nature, into each cell of which, upon its appearance (birth), a program for the growth and development of that organism is implanted.
  Thus, the interaction of a single consciousness with the medium, in which every living being is located, is controlled throughout the life of the organism by an individual form of a single consciousness, which is removed from it if this organism disintegrates due to decrepitude, incurable disease, or simply from being eaten by other organisms.
  It is through programmed organisms of the organic quality, that is, by their very nature capable of experiencing sensations, that consciousness, being an ultra-high-frequency wave formation in the form of a hologram-a high-frequency formation resulting from the superposition of several coherent waves, producing a stationary interference pattern, since the phase difference of the waves does not change-enters the world of events, without which, that is, without the current time formed by them, or rather, through them, no life can exist.
  Consciousness, as an ultra-high-frequency formation, cannot but be a hologram, which, as if being outside of time, along with that, is capable of controlling beingness, which is existing within the current time for the following reasons.
  In a hologram, any part of it repeats the whole.
  In a hologram, each particle of the active does not lose its unity with the entire single-multiple infinite set of the active particles, and therefore can, in particular, with the help of this unity, to recognize, read and copy from an infinity out of time by means and methods, which it is available, necessary for own existence the things in their connection, recognizing them in accordance with own mind (intellect), coupled with form-building abilities (a certain program in the genome) so, as it wants and can, updating every "moment", that is, discrete, but infinitely, a holographic projection as a quasi-temporary basis for one's own existence in the current reality in the form of a living thing in this information process.
  Particles-copies of the active (consciousness), in the association with copies of the passive (lifeless) in a current reality, are able thereby to receive from an infinity out of time the "necessary" copies of things (passive) for them to replace existing copies of things in beingness, including replacing own material base, as well as updating also themselves.
  This information process of the interaction of an infinity out of time, where everything is inseparably, and the holographic projection, where the active and the passive are separated, requires for interaction of the active and the passive as well as for interaction of the active with an infinity out of time the artificial union of the active and passive in one form or another of alive, the main difference of which from everything else is the ability to convert individual consecutive data packets, carrying encoded information, into objects of a current reality for their updating, including consciousness in alive.
  These packets are similar to the pulsed signals from the transmitter via the ether to the television receiver, in which they are converted into a changing decorated picture on the screen.
  That is, alive is also able to convert individual impulse signals containing information into a incessantly changing picture of the world due to a certain inertia of signal processing, which in the minds of any living being nullifies pauses between incoming packets of information (the positions of the update), creating a continuous change in the whole picture, in which arise already real - more or less "dense" - objects, rather than frequency information copies of the active and the passive.
  However, unlike a television set, in which is only being decrypted and converted into an image a scene, that has already been prepared in advance from an appropriate source, a living being has the ability to change this picture in accordance with own needs, desires, at this, a person can change this picture also in accordance with own goals, communicating automatically through own sense organs through a hologram with an unmanifest infinity, although, in the whole, the process of updating beingness is being regulated by a single consciousness of the holographic projection of an infinity out of time.
  As a result, for the consciousness of a living creature arises in motion (energy) shifting world of events - the current reality, or beingness, in which it is already possible to live in one's own present, but in the frameworks of general time.
  In other words, the powerful energy of ultra-high-frequency wave-like structures of a holographic projection of an infinity out of time, which carry in their harmonics corresponding encoded information, is converted into the mass and energy of objects of the current reality, which are related to each other in accordance with the well-known formula E = mc².
  Thus, the active is an ultra-high frequency wave-like formation in a -hologram - a projection of an infinity out of time, the harmonics of this formation are a series of programs, allowing to arise, grow, develop and act correspondingly to the structured matter in the form of the association the particles of the active of a hologram and the particles of the passive, caused by the active from the unmanifest infinity. The hologram also accumulates the information from all living beings. Each section of the hologram contains the information about the entire hologram, that is, everything is contained in each part, which means that each particle of the active is connected to the entire hologram out of time, having thereby the possibility to use any information from the databases of the hologram.
  The active, presenting in all living beings, is consciousness of alive, which is at it, because only it is able to extract by means of the organs of senses and the information processing center of the body in accordance with the existing form-building abilities own information copies as well as copies of things from an infinity out of time through a hologram, sequentially converting them into all objects of beingness - from universes up to the micro-world, from living beings to the favorable environment, around them.
  The active in beingness, becoming in it by the consciousness of living beings, transforms, collects, accumulates and transmits information, acting through alive, but only in order to live and develop in the form of alive in the information flow, which is manifested for all living beings as the current reality (beingness) with things moving in it, the set of which is being compiled as a derivative of their sense organs, both individually and as a whole. Along with that the accumulated information from each individual consciousness in alive is transmitted by it to the database of the hologram, that is, to a single active (consciousness) for further joint use.
  Thereby, the active in beingness, that is, each individual consciousness in the form of alive is a producer, a product, a dynamic carrier and transmitter of information about oneself and own surrounding. At this, each individual consciousness in alive, in order to avoid stagnation, on the one hand, replenishes the available information in interaction with other kinds of individual consciousness in alive, continuously transmitting it to the databases of the hologram, and on the other hand, each individual consciousness in the form of alive one consistently replenishes the current information for oneself through the hologram from the inexhaustible reservoir of an infinity outside of time, providing own infinite development.
  Beingness, in which we are, in the form of a complex hierarchical structure of an infinite series of universes with inhabited planets, interspersed in them, and other attributes, is the material (thingness) derivative of an ultra-high-frequency structure - a hologram, that carries information for subsequent conversion of it into various objects, and the manifestations in this surrounding of living beings.
  In turn, a hologram as the superhigh-frequency formation of a special kind is an infinite projection of an infinity out of time, but the prototype of time already manifests in the hologram in the form of discontinuities of infinity as a consequence of its frequency structure that carries information for the formation of beingness in the form of space with moving objects. Thus, the holographic projection serves as a kind of laying between an infinity out of time, potentially containing everything, that is, the past, present and future, and beingness, containing only the past and present.
  Creation itself, as a system outside of time and along with that in time eternally, represents an infinite, timeless Nothing, as well as a collection of finite objects, manifested in time infinitely, which we call beingness, or existing entity.
  Along with that, the information bridge connecting an infinity out of time and beingness can be considered a projection of an infinity out of time in the form of a kind of formation, hidden from our view because it represents ultra-high-frequency formations that are not perceived by us in any way, and, moreover, are mutually in the opposite phase.
  As a result, when they arise, they immediately destroy each other, representing in this respect, like an infinity out of time, an infinite nothingness, but only integrally.
  Nevertheless, each "half" of these wave-like high-frequency formations, arising, can serve as the accumulator and transmitter of information like radio waves in the ether, connecting an infinity out of time and beingness.
  Thus, the active (consciousness) and the passive (things) are capable of "being" in three places and states: inseparably in a timeless infinity, separately in the frequency projection of a timeless infinity in the form of wave-like structures, and also separately and partly together in beingness in the form of more or less dense objects.
  ***
  First religion and then science attempted to answer the eternal question of how and why Creation arose.
  Religion, in essence, reduced its answer to the decision of an omniscient and omnipotent being outside the world to suddenly produce everything-that is, it presented it as a random, unmotivated decision by a being outside the world, appearing out of nowhere and somehow capable of doing so.
  Scientists, in turn, also began to seek an answer to this question, apparently following the path indicated by religious denominations, since the eternal existence of Creation found absolutely no resolution in their minds. True, they offered answers to the question of the universe's origins in the form of various hypotheses based on a purely materialistic foundation, and among these hypotheses, the most fashionable today is the "Matrix" hypothesis-that is, a virtual (artificial) world-a kind of simulation, a phantom-created by a more advanced intelligence-programmer located outside this artificial world. However, as the authors of this hypothesis believe, this advanced intelligence may also exist within a matrix created by an even more advanced intelligence, and so on, forming a closed chain of these simulations.
  This model of our world's origin is literally copied from the model of 's the divine origin of Creation, except God is replaced by a programmer, and we all play a role assigned by him within a program defined by an artificial intelligence created by some perfect mind beyond our reach.
  Such plagiarism is not very interesting, since it also fails to answer the same question: where did this perfect creator mind come from and where was it located before the creation of Creation?
  Moreover, as it turns out, such computer game with us in the form of a simulation of Creation is simply technically impossible under any circumstances, since the complexity of this simulation, measured by the number of processor hours, memory capacity, and power consumption, increases proportionally to the number of particles to be simulated, while even storing information about several hundred electrons in a computer's memory would require a memory capacity in terms of atoms greater in number than the number of atoms present in the universe.
  The hypothesis of the "Big Bang" as the cause of the emergence of our universe, which astrophysicists insists on, also does not carry reasonable assumptions about what happened before this "explosion", it is not known by whom or what, as well as it is not clear from what and for what produced initially, especially since before the Big Bang, as astrophysicists believe, there was no time.
  However, the absence of time before the Big Bang does not mean that one should avoid the problem of the otherworldly, since the beginning in the form of the Big Bang, if it is proclaimed by the beginning, was somehow initiated by something or someone, and the very absence of time before this explosion, how do the authors of this hypothesis understand it, only indicates an insufficient representation of the essence of time. That is, this hypothesis of the origin of the world raises doubts by its one-sidedness and lack of understanding of the essence of some attributes of Creation.
  Almost all religious concepts regarding the emergence of Creation are also based on the sudden decision of some otherworldly being to create a world in which its prototypes will live, glorifying its creator.
  The hypothesis about the generation of our universe in the form of virtual reality by quantum states also does not give an answer about the reason for this generation.
  Common to these explanations of the emergence of Creation is the actual lack of recognition of Creation as the eternal, putting it in the position of initiation by some outsider being or some formation. And there is a reason for this, which consists in the absence of models that do without the starting point from which everything that exists arises, except for the Hindu Creation in the form of an endless series of repeating, identical, closed circular movements-cycles.
  Nevertheless, Hinduism claims that all these worlds were also created.
  Of the largest religious denominations, Buddhism alone does not recognize the creator god, but the Buddha also did not answer the question of whether Creation is eternal, apparently realizing the impossibility of discovering convincing evidence of this eternity at that level of knowledge, although he denied the creation of the world.
  A more detailed description of the various hypotheses of the emergence of Creation is given in my work "Creation - a hologram at the base or a matrix (critical review)?" [13], and the characteristic of a single consciousness-hologram as a projection of a timeless infinity, through which and with the help of which beingness in time is formed with its certain characteristic, is given in the work "About the sources of change (motion) and development" [see, for example, 14].
  ***
  Thus, the world we know, represented by the universe with star systems, planets, and radiation of varying frequencies, but not exceeding 10 to the power of 43 in hertz, obtained through Planck time, in which the formation of current time and thus "solid" reality is possible, is that component of Creation-beingness-without which the world of events is impossible. Therefore, beingness is being formed through and for finite living beings, since only through them, in the world of events occurring to them, is consciousness capable of change.
  The impossibility of perceiving or registering consciousness is apparently explained by the fact that it exists beyond this frequency boundary and, therefore, cannot directly manifest in beingness existence as we know it, except in the form of the finite living beings. However, the discreteness of these beings does not mean their disappearance, but merely an intermittent form of their manifestation, which, nevertheless, ensures the eternal life of both a single consciousness and each of its individual forms.
  Be that as it may, in our comparatively low-frequency dimension, we find ourselves in a more or less dense environment of things and phenomena in current time. In this world (beingness), things manifest and renew themselves in space, various processes are underway, and various events occur and relationships arise with us - people, whereas for the otherworldly in such high-frequency world outside of current time, all this is impossible; that is, this otherworldly is not the vital.
  However, thanks to living beings, which are a kind of converter, frequency matter from infinity outside time, carrying information and energy, is partially transformed into "solid" matter in the current time.
  Information delivers to this matter, the dominant and productive component of which is living beings, space, movement and changes, which is being controlled by a single consciousness through the same complex living organic complexes, the highest of which is a person - a being capable of transforming ordinary activity into freedom.
  ***
  What explains and what does such approach lead to existing from the most important position for development within the framework of all kinds of changes - from the position of creativity and freedom?
  The direct source of freedom lies in the main property of activity - dissatisfaction with the human consciousness, which, on the one hand, manifests itself strictly within the framework of the natural activity (natural aspirations), and on the other hand, within the framework of targeted (aware) aspirations.
  A person's natural aspirations are supported by his instinctive perseverance in these aspirations, that is, they do not go beyond sensations and the corresponding methods of processing information entering the body, which can be denoted by the natural intelligence - as if own minicomputer, inherent even in bacteria and viruses.
  The conscious aspirations of a person are supported by his will, but already with representation of their possible result in the form of the purpose, and here the person is already beyond feelings to the sphere of representations, the ideas and imagination.
  As a result, the person receives interaction of instinctive perseverance and will as external expression of interaction of both types of dissatisfaction of consciousness with the participation of individual intelligence.
  The space of liberty at the development of living organisms is being gradually changed - from almost complete lack of it, besides the most primitive activity in bacteria and ciliates, up to the multilateral mind of the primates, able already to the subconscious choice out of a much larger set of sensations, but, nevertheless, limited by only them, and further - from the consciousness of primates to the human consciousness, which allows, finally, to get out of the frame of sensations, and thereby acquire in own consciousness the greatest scope for its development in the generations.
  Such progress of consciousness in the course of the development of organisms on Earth indicates the true destination of liberty, manifested thanks to the dissatisfaction of consciousness in the actions of these emerging and dying creatures - the endless change and development of consciousness through them, the top of which is the maximum scope for liberty in the human consciousness, that allows the eternal consciousness again and again through the emerging goals, projects and fantasies of a person to learn new things both for oneself, and about himself endlessly.
  Thus, from all living beings only a person is able to become truly free due to the manifestation in him of the highest degree of dissatisfaction of consciousness in the form of will.
  Perseverance, and even more stubbornness, emanating from dissatisfaction of the animal form of consciousness in a person, which
  which are not recognized by a person, most of all hold on to the proven and familiar old, satisfactorily ensuring the existence of a person, and, most importantly, his survival, and will, as a rule, "drags" him forward - to the new, unknown and therefore - unpredictable and frightening. To overcome this fear of the new, we need a will that creates stability in the pursuit of novelty, that is, to the formation of additional channels for new information.
  Will, as a product of dissatisfaction of self-consciousness, is the most effective incentive to ensure that a person's dissatisfaction with current circumstances, which they would consciously like to improve, does not remain in vain.
  That is, will is the "drive belt" of a person's dissatisfaction in his self-consciousness with the state of society, the educational level, and, in general, the cultural level. Therefore, will is the primary, open means of liberating a person from the mere slavery of sensations.
  Thus, the will as a product of dissatisfaction of consciousness of the person with an environment, does not operate circumstances at all, but serves in the basic for overcoming obstacles on the way to the purpose which is formed by dissatisfaction of consciousness together with intelligence in a given period of time, and their very decision to start moving towards the intended goal means "the inclusion" of will to maintain a person"s striving for the goal in order to avoid its loss for external or internal reasons.
  Therefore, to talk about free will (liberty of will), if the latter is a product of a person"s dissatisfaction by certain circumstances and by oneself in the frameworks of his self-awareness, has no sense - will, as such, has no autonomy.
  The will, as a human-conscious effort to eliminate problems that impede the achievement of the goal, is only the result of the solution of the intellect due to the presentation of the dissatisfaction of self-consciousness as a reaction to the emerging challenges. The decision itself to advance towards the intended goal is a signal, that forces a person to a steady progress towards the goal. This inducement from dissatisfaction of self-consciousness is will.
  The choice of the goal is also determined by the dissatisfaction of self-awareness with the current circumstances (the present) in the hope of a favorable outcome in the future. However, in the not yet formed future, there are no circumstances so far, but moving of a person towards the goal forms them, producing another present.
  That is, in his striving for all new goals, a person finds himself in other circumstances, thereby creating a different reality, and in the short interval between the former and future circumstances he becomes independent in general from the circumstances - the former have disappeared, and the new ones have not yet appeared.
  Thus, the seeming restriction of freedom in specific goals actually incessantly releases to the person space for all new and new worlds, clearly demonstrating as the dissatisfaction of self-consciousness by means of passing through the goals turns into liberty.
  As for the choice of the object of aspirations (goal) by a person from a multitude of possibilities, it is realized quite consciously in accordance with the available information only due to the dissatisfaction of the person"s self-consciousness with objects and phenomena at the moment outside or inside him using the processing of this information by the intellect.
  However, the dissatisfaction of the animal consciousness of a person always unconsciously intervenes in this process, which, on the one hand, does not allow a person to turn into a computer, and on the other hand, forces him to be mistaken often.
  At best, similar joint process of the choice, that is, with the instinctive participation of the animal consciousness, is a source of creativity, allowing intelligence into the boundless subconscious, and at worst - pulls together the persons with animals in their needs in the case of an almost complete replacement of self-consciousness by subconscious impulses, or makes him similar to a computer that is only capable of sorting through options for implementation of allegedly favorable choice (combinatorics, based on a formal-logical approach), making a person by a pathetic semblance of the artificial intelligence, since it is often impossible to determine the greatest profit or loss as a result of combination of known variants.
  Thus, the basis of a person"s choice of a mode of action or an object of aspirations lies in the dissatisfaction of his consciousness, without which a person is not able to have either desires or goals, and the dissatisfaction itself is determined by changes of the information flows, covering the person.
  That is, a stable satisfaction of the consciousness or ignoring the incoming information first produces a person"s indifference to everything, then - degradation, up to dementia, that is, if not physical, then the actual death of a person as an active being, who dropped out of own time, having refused activity.
  ***
  It's also interesting that a perfectly viable model of Creation, in our view, as a timeless infinity, communicating through its infinite projection-the hologram-consciousness-with beingness, consisting of the finite active (living) and passive (lifeless) objects, eternally renewing and changing in their own and common time, among other things, answers one of the most insoluble questions within the conventional paradigm of reflection on the base on the generally accepted model of Creation as a universe or universes arising and disappearing in time, - can a single and indivisible whole along with that manifests oneself as a multitude of separate objects?
  We have also shown above that all models of the universe, based on supposedly scientific approaches, as well as on the views of religious faiths, fail to elucidate a more or less plausible cause for the emergence of Creation or the source of its eternity.
  In particular, science now claims that Creation arose, essentially, as a result of random fluctuations from nothing (a special kind of vacuum), but this absolutizes randomness, making an extraneous, meaningless factor the basis of everything, including the cause for the appearance of a living reason.
  In turn, religion tries to make of the same randomness as meaningful by elevating it to the rank of a god who suddenly decided to create everything from nothing, including a living mind, who is, however, it is not clear where, and, therefore, it is not known where and how he came from oneself.
  True, Buddhism does not recognize the omnipotent and all-knowing creator god, considering each person a divine particle in the stream of endless energy of the Universe, and the Buddha himself did not answer the question "Is the Universe eternal?" This, by the way, is very wise, since so far no one has been able to find the source of eternity.
  Be that as it may, but the hologram-consciousness in its main feature is all in one, that is, in an enduring unity with all its particles (individual forms of consciousness, as if covering each organism), gets the opportunity to live in the guise of living beings, then sinking to the level of animal consumption, then rising to peak heights of knowledge of beauty, perfection, selflessness, selflessness, the laws of nature and society in the course of their deeds, and at the same time blissful, failing and winning victories, dying and recreating, experiencing the deed.
  Thus, a single consciousness in its particles changes eternally and infinitely in a variety of countless finite living beings with their halting but immediately resuming lives.
  Bibliography
  1. Аркадий и Борис Стругацкие. Волны гасят ветер. "Мир полудня (сборник)". Москва, АСТ. 2016.
  2. Фёдоров Н. Ф. Супраморализм, или всеобщий синтез". 1906. https://predanie.ru)"
  Супраморализм, или всеобщий синтез". 1906. https://predanie.ru)"
  3. Фёдоров Н. Ф. Философия общего дела. 1906. https://predanie.ru
  4. Treatise of Human Nature by David Hume. 1739. V.1 Reprinted from the Original Edition three volumes and edited, with an analytical index, by L. A. Selby Bigge, M. A. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1896).
  5. Р Декарт. Начала философии". Раздел "Об основах человеческого познания". Антология мировой философии". Том 2. С. 239. "Мысль". Москва. 1970.
  6. Chalmers D.J. Moving Forward on the Problem of Consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies Imprint Academic, 1997. Vol. 4, No 1/ P 3-46.
  7. Aristotle. Metaphysics. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
  8. Кант. О форме и причинах чувственно воспринимаемого и умопостигаемого мира. - Сочинения, т. 2. М., 1964.
  9. Nizovtsev Y. M. The explanation of the facts of acceleration and deceleration of time. 2020. Collection "It's the other way around. Answers to tricky questions about interesting things. Part 2. Section 2. [Electronic resource]. Access mode: www.litres.ru. Amazon. Yury Nizovtsev.
  10. Nizovtsev Y. M. On the reasons for the accelerated development of human communities. 2022. Collection "On the necessity of a person presence in Creation. Section 2. [Electronic resource]. Access mode: www.litres.ru. Amazon. Yury Nizovtsev.
  11. 1980. David Bohm, Wholeness and the Implicate Order, London: Routledge, ISBN 0-7100-0971-2
  12. Nizovtsev Y. M. What can dissatisfaction provide and how does it act? 2021. Collection "Contradictory but real. Part 2. [Electronic resource]. Access mode: www.litres.ru. Amazon. Yury Nizovtsev.
  13. Nizovtsev Y. M. Creation - a hologram at the base or a matrix (critical review)? 2024. Collection "Creation as the unity of eternity in time and nothingness out of time". Chapter 10. [Electronic resource]. Access mode: www.litres.ru. Amazon. Yury Nizovtsev.
  14. Nizovtsev Y. M. About the sources of change (motion) and development.
   2024. Collection "Creation as the unity of eternity in time and nothingness out of time". Chapter 9. [Electronic resource]. Access mode: www.litres.ru. Amazon. Yury Nizovtsev.
  
 Ваша оценка:
Связаться с программистом сайта.

Новые книги авторов СИ, вышедшие из печати:
О.Болдырева "Крадуш. Чужие души" М.Николаев "Вторжение на Землю"

Как попасть в этoт список

Кожевенное мастерство | Сайт "Художники" | Доска об'явлений "Книги"